Submit your track to our AI music analysis system. Ranked against hundreds of real hits and flops. Specific, evidence-based feedback on what's working, what's not, and where you stand. One honest report, sent to your inbox.
Not a number in a vacuum. A full picture of where your song stands, what's strong, and what to fix — backed by comparison against hundreds of songs with known outcomes.
We maintain a growing library of hundreds of songs — charting hits, deep cuts, and genuine flops — all scored and ranked against each other. Before your song ever gets evaluated, our system has already proven it can tell the difference between a #1 record and a song that never made it past 10K streams.
The hits rank high. The flops don't. That's not a claim — it's continuous calibration we invest in every day so that your results are grounded in reality.
Your song gets evaluated within its genre. A country song gets judged by the standards of country. A trap demo gets judged by the standards of trap. We don't apply pop metrics to a jazz ballad or rock expectations to a reggaeton banger.
What comes back is the kind of feedback a great A&R rep would give you — honest, specific, and grounded in what actually works in your lane.
Built by the team at xpolls.ai.
You can upload your song to any AI chatbot and get back "nice imagery, solid hook, maybe try adding more dynamics to the bridge. 7/10." It's the musical equivalent of "you have a great personality." It's what your friend says when they don't want to hurt your feelings.
General-purpose AI is designed to be helpful and encouraging. That's great for homework. It's useless for knowing whether your song is actually good enough to release. Every song gets a 7. Every artist gets told they're "promising." There's no reference frame and no accountability.
We're built differently. Our system is trained against hundreds of songs with known outcomes — real hits that charted, real flops that didn't. We put the work into calibration so it reliably tells the difference between a #1 record and a song that never cracked 10K streams. That's what makes your percentile ranking mean something.
A chatbot tells you what you want to hear. We tell you where you actually stand — with specific, measurable evidence for every claim. If your vocal pitch accuracy is below average, we'll tell you exactly where. If your lyrics rely on clichés, we'll quote the lines. And if your song is genuinely in the top 15% — we'll tell you that too, backed by the same system that correctly ranks Bohemian Rhapsody above Friday.
If you want encouragement, ask a chatbot. If you want to know where you actually rank, check it here.
Want to see what the full $9.99 report actually looks like? View a sample report →
One track per month. See where you rank and get the key strengths and weaknesses.
The complete picture. Every dimension scored in depth, with specific notes on what to fix and why.
// CREATOR ($29/mo unlimited) + PRO ($99/mo A&R-grade analysis) coming Q3 2026.
A chatbot will tell you your song is "promising" and suggest vague improvements. It does that for every song — there's no calibration, no reference frame, no way to know if its "7/10" means anything. We rank your song against a continuously calibrated library of hundreds of songs with known outcomes. Our percentile means something because the system provably puts real hits at the top and real flops at the bottom. A chatbot is a cheerleader. We're the judge.
Every dimension that separates memorable songs from forgettable ones: vocal quality and range, production craft, lyrical sophistication, melodic hooks, rhythmic feel, harmonic interest, arrangement surprise, mix quality. Each is scored independently so you know exactly where you're strong and where you're not.
It means exactly what it says. If you're in the 72nd percentile, your song scored higher than 72% of the songs in our catalog — which includes undeniable classics, solid mid-tier releases, and genuine flops. We calibrate continuously: Bohemian Rhapsody sits at the top. Friday by Rebecca Black sits near the bottom. Your song lands somewhere on that scale.
Do it. We'll recognize it via audio fingerprinting and tell you what it is. Then we'll score it anyway — and you'll see it rank exactly where it should. It's the fastest way to see for yourself that the system works.
Yes — and arguably it's the best use case. AI music tools generate dozens of tracks per session. HitCheck tells you which generations are worth refining, which are worth releasing, and which to discard. We flag AI-sourced tracks in the report.
Results delivered by email — typically within a few minutes. The analysis takes time because we're doing real audio processing, not just reading metadata. You don't need to keep the page open.
No. Your uploads are processed for analysis only, stored long enough to deliver your report (30 days), then deleted. We don't train models on user submissions. Period.
Yes. HitCheck is fully AI-powered — built by xpolls.ai, which specializes in building bespoke AI evaluation systems. We process your audio through specialized signal analysis (real measurements from the waveform), then evaluate it using AI models built specifically for music criticism — not a general-purpose chatbot responding to a prompt. The difference: our system is trained to tell the difference between a #1 record and a song that never cracked 10K streams — we put the work into calibration so your feedback actually means something. A chatbot has no reference frame. We do.
Don't trust us on faith. Upload something you already know is a hit — a recent #1, a classic, whatever — and see if it ranks in our top tier. We've put the work into calibration so that known hits rank high and known flops don't. That's what makes your percentile meaningful.
One honest verdict. Sent to your inbox. First check free.
Check a track nowLabels, publishers, sync houses: Need a custom AI evaluation system tuned to your catalog and audience? We build them. Talk to us →